Basic technology skills change all the time. Recently e-readers or tablet readers came on the market. While not everyone has jumped into the market, recent sales figures indicate early adoption of the devices is quite successful. Sales in 2010 reached over five million units. This figure is Kindle specific. There are many other manufacturers in the reader market. So, the skills to operate these devices are or soon will be part of the minimum technology skills already mentioned.
I purchased an e-reader for school. Several colleagues asked for a demonstration, and upon seeing me use the reader decided to venture into the market. This eventually came back to haunt me! These colleagues had what can only be described as a miserable experience. The reader needed configuration, software downloads, installation of different programs, and needless to say these devices are not out of the box ready to use. Now these are technology teachers, and are quite bright. I would not think these people would need assistance. I queried: Did you read the instructions? No, it did not come with any, was the reply! I will digress here and merely state there is a learning curve, these colleagues are not gadget oriented, but possess texting skills and computer skills. These colleagues became discouraged. I took it upon myself to provide training and assistance.
I will outline this situation in brief. These colleagues possess advanced computer skills, possess what I would consider strong self-efficacy, and are early adopters who purchased these devices last year when this particular device was introduced into the market. Initially these colleagues were quite excited, but as time wore on became disenchanted. I demonstrated how to configure the device to receive Wi-Fi signals. I explained the user manual was online and needed to be downloaded. Finally I demonstrated the features of the device, i.e. VOD, movies, books, and email features of the reader. Over time the colleagues enjoyed the device, but now I wonder how could I have approached this same scenario utilizing Keller’s ARCS model?
Keller’s ARCS model (Driscoll, 2005) starts with attention, and I had a captive audience. Attention was a non-issue. Next I need to focus on relevance so retention of knowledge or skills would take place. This should utilize cognitive function and try to make the knowledge personal. Obviously the colleagues were interested for their own personal reasons. This was another area where I really did not have to work hard. How to gain confidence is the issue with this device. The colleagues for lack of a better term, failed in their attempts to learn how to use the device. So, I would model the methods of how to set up the Wi-Fi, and the various other tasks the reader could do. I believe I covered this quite well. Lastly, satisfaction potential was initiated through personal interface with the reader. The device had many future uses the colleagues saw potential in such as e-mail and editing Microsoft Office documents.
While this might not be a prime example of how to handle the situation, ARCS would have worked, and I have no doubt my self-efficacy level will rise the more I utilize ARCS.
Reference
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Response to Ardoin-Bailey:
ReplyDeleteWanda,
Two colleagues have fallen by the wayside. They need more encouragement and lessons in utilization of this device. Others are using the device successfully.
Thanks,
Bradley
Bradley,
ReplyDeleteDo you think that if you had shared with your colleagues upfront that most e-readers did not come fully equipped and there would be some downloading involved that their initial experience might have turned out differently or they would have at least purchased with a different expectation in mind? I can see how they would have been discouraged after seeing you in action with your e-reader then finding their own was nothing like what they witnessed in the demonstrations.
Bradley,
ReplyDeleteIsn’t amazing that a technology like the e-reader, which has so much potential, turns out to have such a high and difficult learning curve! Since your adoption and that of your colleagues, has the technology changed? Is it yet “out of the box ready”? If not, what are your thoughts about its potential diffusion in society given that your experience indicates it is difficult even for technology people to use?
On a side note, how to do you like reading on your e-reader compared to a regular book?
-Christine
Bradley,
ReplyDeleteOne effective strategy my school had which helped the Mimio Interactive become adopted effectively, was the support system that was created. In a school of our size (over 72 teachers), it was necessary to have teachers to train and support teachers. I think this would work effectively in any school. We did it by grade levels, and every grade level had 2-3 teacher "experts" that other teachers could go to for support. Do you think this would have helped in your school?
Lauren Dart